What drives
a middle school curriculum?
Why does
deep skill development not dictate the middle school curriculum? Why are we
stuck trying to force middle schoolers to absorb information when they could be
practicing thinking and interacting skills? We do we insist the middle school
day be broken into 50 minute chunks that ask them to transition to different
environments and systems instead of allowing them to settle in to spaces that
allow variation of activity without demanding navigation skills? Why do we squander
the energetic good will, bravery, and creative potential of this age group for
the sake of teaching them that mind-numbing data absorption is the predominant
function of the educational system? What would middle school feel and look like
if it honored the inherent strengths of our students, made them feel proud of
their instincts for justice, ownership, and interdependence, and helped them
hone those compulsions into practical, life skills? How good could middle
school really feel?
These are
the questions that lie at the heart of this Blog. Understanding our
misconceptions of the 10-14 year old mind is the key to serving them better.
And understanding the vision of world- and their place in it- that we project
upon them through our educating institutions, is the key to changing how we
educate them. And besides, anyone who has stepped out of the traditional
paradigm and begun to engage with these people on terms that are natural to
them know the great source of inspiration, hope, and entertainment they can be.
Yes, I want middle schoolers to like school more- who doesn’t?- but as much as
that, I want middle school teachers to like middle schoolers more!
When we
think about educating students in the middle years- grades 5-8- we are beset
with concern about the preparation they come to us with and the preparation with
which we should send them off. These are
valid concerns; as educators, we all want to be part of a system that prepares
young people for a successful life, so we want to work within a continuous
program designed to meet their needs.
Unfortunately, this system is skewed towards the upper and lower ends-
grades 1-4 and 9-12- and the students in the middle are neglected. While I
would argue that our understanding of the intellectual and emotional needs of
those two groups- thus the educational program perceived to best fit them- could evlove, that is not my field of expertise. So lets talk here about what can
drive the middle school curriculum- through a series of philosophical postulations
(posts- get it?) and practical suggestions. Join me because Life is a
collaborative meritocracy: we get rewarded for what we do together!
No comments:
Post a Comment